Main Article Content
In this paper multiple criteria decision making approach of alternative fuels for waste collection vehicles in southeast region of Serbia was presented. Eight alternative fuels and advanced vehicle technologies were ranked according to thirteen criteria, including financial, socio-technical, and environmental. Assessment of alternatives was performed by using the weighted aggregated sum product assessment method and results were verified using multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis method. Considered criteria were obtained from previous researches and by assessment of professional experts from manufacturing industries, public utility companies, and academics institutions. The analysis showed that both biodiesel fuels – derived from used cooking oil or from vegetable oils are the best alternative fuels for Serbian waste collection vehicles in this point of time. Compressed natural gas-powered vehicles were also ranked high in this analysis, but due to the lack of financial capability for their purchase (especially in southeast region of Serbia), their gradual introduction into the waste collection fleet was proposed.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of the published article and have the right to use the article in the ways permitted to third parties under the - Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. Full bibliographic information (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages) about the original publication must be provided and a link must be made to the article's DOI.
The authors and third parties who wish use the article in a way not covered by the the -Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) licence must obtain a written consent of the publisher. This license allows others to download the paper and share it with others as long as they credit the journal, but they cannot change it in any way or use it commercially.
Authors grant to the publisher the right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media.
 Sousanis, J., World Vehicle Population Tops 1 Billion Units, WardsAuto.com, Aug. 2011, retrieved March 15, 2016, http://wardsauto.com/ar/world_vehicle_population_110815/ index.html
 Petrović, G., et al., Optimal Preventive Maintenance of Refuse Collection Vehicles Using Probabilistic and Computational Intelligence Approach, Sci. Res. Essays, 6 (2011), 16, pp. 3485-3497
 *** PUC “Medijana”, Report on the Effectiveness and Maintenance of Vehicles in 2013 and 2014, Public utility company – “Medijana”, Nis, Serbia, 2013
 Fazeli, R., et al., A Multi-Criteria Evaluation Framework for Alternative Light-Duty Vehicles Technologies, International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 1 (2011), 2, pp. 230-251
 Tzeng, G. H., et al., Multi-Criteria Analysis of Alternative-Fuel Buses for Public Transportation, Energy Policy, 33 (2005), 11, pp. 1373-1383
 Tsita, K. G., Pilavachi, P. A., Evaluation of Alternative Fuels for the Greek Road Transport Sector Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Energy Policy, 48 (2012), Sep., pp. 677-686
 Vahdani, B., et al., Two Novel FMCDM Methods for Alternative-Fuel Buses Selection, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35 (2011), 3, pp. 1396-1412
 Sakthivel, G., et al., A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Modeling Approach for the Best Biodiesel Blend Selection Based on ANP-TOPSIS Analysis, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 6 (2015), 1, pp. 239-256
 Mohamadabadi, H. S., et al., Development of a Multi-Criteria Assessment Model for Ranking of Renewable and Non-Renewable Transportation Fuel Vehicles, Energy, 34 (2009), 1, pp. 112-125
 Maimoun, M., et al., Multi-Level Multi-Criteria Analysis of Alternative Fuels for Waste Collection Vehicles in the United States, Science of the Total Environment, 550 (2016), Apr., pp. 349-361
 Peters, S., et al., Automotive Manufacturing Technologies – an International Viewpoint. in: Manufacturing Review, 1 (2014), 10, pp. 1-12
 ***, Hydropower, E-Power and Dualpower, retrieved February 2, 2016, FAUN Product Brochure, http://www.faun.com/en/home/ecopower.html
 de Oliveira, L. A., et al., A Financial and Environmental Evaluation for the Introduction of Diesel- Hydraulic Hybrid Drive System in Urban Waste Collection, Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Enviro., 31 (2014), Avg., pp. 100-109
 Milutinović, B., et al., The Effect of Environmental Indicators on the Waste Treatment Scenarios Ranking, Facta universitatis Series: Mechanical Engineering 13 (2015), 2, pp. 155-167
 Maimoun, M. A., Environmental Study of Solid Waste Collection, M. Sc. thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Fla., USA, 2011
 ***, The Association of Oil Companies of Serbia (UNKS), retrieved March 3, 2016, http://www.unks.rs/ index.php?page=home&lang=2
 ***, http://www.GlobalPetrolPrices.com, retrieved March 3, 2016
 ***, http://www.autotraveler.ru, (in Russian), retrieved March, 2016
 ***, Alternative Fuels Data Center Fuel Properties Comparison, United States Department of Energy. February 27, 2013, retrieved March 3, 2016, http://www.afdc.energy.gov/fuels/fuel_comparison_ chart.pdf
 Keller, M., FOEN 2010: Pollutant Emissions from Road Transport, 1990 to 2035. Updated in 2010. Federal Office for the Environment, Bern. Environmental studies no. 1021, Federal Office for the Environment, Bern, Switzerland, 2010
 Papić, V., et al., Determination of Emissions of Gaseous Pollutants from Road Transport Using COPERT IV Model of the Environmental European Agency (in Serbian), Institute of the Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Belgrade, 2010
 Faiz, A., et al., Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles: Standards and Technologies for Controlling Emissions, Washington (D. C.): World Bank. ISBN: 0821334441, 1996
 Manojlović, A. V., et al., Fleet Renewal: An Approach to Achieve Sustainable road transport, Thermal science, 15 (2011), 4, pp. 1223-1236
 Zavadskas, E. K., et al., Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment, Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika – Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 122 (2012), 6, pp. 3-6
 Zavadskas, E. K., et al., Selecting a Contractor by Using a Novel Method for Multiple Attribute Analysis: Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment with grey values (WASPAS-G), Studies in Informatics and Control 24 (2015), 2, pp. 141-150
 Turskis, Z., et al., Hybrid Model Based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy WASPAS for Construction Site Selection, International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 10 (2015), 6, pp. 873-888
 Zavadskas, E. K., et al., Extension of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment with Interval- Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers (WASPAS-IVIF), Applied Soft Computing, 24 (2014), Nov., pp. 1013-1021
 Madić, M., et al., Business and Engineering Decision Making by Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods (in Serbian), University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia, 2015
 Chakraborty, S., Zavadskas, E. K., Applications of WASPAS Method in Manufacturing Decision Making, Informatica, 25 (2014), 1, pp. 1-20
 Triantaphyllou, E., Mann, S. H., An Examination of the Effectiveness of Multi-Dimensional Decision-Making Methods: A Decision-Making Paradox, Decision Support Systems, 5 (1989), 3, pp. 303-312
 Saparauskas, J., et al., Selection of Façade’s Alternatives of Commercial and Public Buildings Based on Multiple Criteria, International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 15 (2011), 2, pp. 189-203
 Brauers, W. K. M., Zavadskas, E. K., The MOORA Method and its Application to Privatization in a Transition Economy, Control and Cybernetics, 35 (2006), 2, pp. 445-469