Main Article Content

Toni D. IVANOV Aleksandar M. SIMONOVIĆ Nebojša B. PETROVIĆ Vasko G. FOTEV Ivan A. KOSTIĆ


An airfoil was parameterized using the Class-Shape Transformation technique and then optimized via Genetic Algorithm. The aerodynamic characteristics of  the airfoil were obtained with the use of a computational fluid dynamics software. The automated numerical technique was validated using available experimental data and then the optimization procedure was repeated for few different turbulence models. The obtained optimized airfoils were then compared in order to gain some insight on the influence of the different turbulence models on the optimization result.

Article Details

How to Cite
IVANOV, Toni D. et al. INFLUENCE OF SELECTED TURBULENCE MODEL ON THE OPTIMIZATION OF A CST PARAMETERIZED AIRFOIL. Thermal Science, [S.l.], mar. 2017. ISSN 2334-7163. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 24 feb. 2018. doi:
Received 2017-03-07
Accepted 2017-03-14
Published 2017-03-14


[1] Mukesh, R., et al., Airfoil Shape Optimization Using Non-traditional Optimization Technique and its Validation, Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences, 26 (2014), pp. 191-197
[2] Shahrokhi, A., Jahangirian, A., Airfoil Shape Parameterization for Optimum Navier-Stokes Design with Genetic Algorithm, Aerospace Science and Technology, 11 (2007), pp. 443-450
[3] Ribeiro, A.,F.,P., et al., An airfoil Optimization Technique for Wind Turbines, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36 (2012), pp. 4898-4907
[4] Derksen, R.,W., Rogalsky, T., Bezier-PARSEC: An Optimized Aerofoil Parameterization for Design, Advances in Engineering Software, 41 (2010), pp. 923-930
[5] Lane, A., K., Marshall, D., D., Inverse Airfoil Design Utilizing CST Parameterization, (AIAA 2010- 1228), 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, Florida, 2010, pp. 1-14
[6] Entz, R., M., U., et al. Methods for Preliminary Airfoil Optimization, (AIAA 2009-3774), 27th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, San Antonio, Texas,2009, pp. 1-15
[7] Kulfan, B., M., Bussoletti, J., E., “Fundamental” Parametric Geometry Representations for Aircraft Component Shapes, 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference: the modelling and simulation frontier for multidisciplinary design optimization, Portsmouth, Virginia, 2006, pp. 1-45 or Paper 6948
[8] Kulfan, B., M., A Universal Parametric Geometry Representation Method – “CST”, 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2007, pp. 1-36 or Paper 62
[9] Kulfan, B., M., Recent Extensions and Applications of the ‘CST’ Universal Parametric Geometry representation method, The Aeronautical Journal, 114 (2010), 1153, pp. 156-176
[10] Beasley, D., et al., An Overview of Genetic Algorithm: Part 1, Fundamentals, University Computing, 15 (1993), pp. 58-69
[11] Beasley, D., et al., An Overview of Genetic Algorithm: Part 2, Research topics, University Computing, 15 (1993), pp. 170-181
[12] Cao, Y., J., Wu, Q., H., Teaching Genetic Algorithm Using MATLAB, International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 36 (1999), pp. 139-159
[13] ***, ANSYS FLUENT Theory Guide, ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA, 2015
[14] ***, ANSYS FLUENT User Guide, ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA, 2015
[15] Graham, J., D., A Systematic Investigation of Pressure Distributions at High Speeds Over Five Representative NACA Low-Drag and Conventional Airfoil Sections, NACA Report No. 832, 1945
[16] Nitzberg E., G. and Crandal, S., A Study of Flow Changes Associated with Airfoil Section Drag Rise at Supercritical Speeds, NACA Technical Note No. 1813, 1949

Most read articles by the same author(s)